首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative evaluation of fluidized bed assisted drag finishing and centrifugal disk dry finishing
【2h】

A comparative evaluation of fluidized bed assisted drag finishing and centrifugal disk dry finishing

机译:流化床辅助阻力精加工与离心盘干法精加工的比较评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Drag finishing of brass (Cu-30 wt.% Zn) rings using fluidized abrasives, which is a new finishing technology, is comparatively evaluated with centrifugal disk finishing. The comparison was performed by selecting the same abrasive granulates of two different sizes and operating the equipment for the same processing time or at their respective maximum speeds. The experimental analysis investigated the change in workpiece morphology, material removal during finishing and dimensional accuracy. The results showed that each of the types of equipment investigated in the study were capable of a high finishing performance with a relatively short processing time. However, fluidized bed assisted drag finishing was more effective than centrifugal disk finishing in both the achievable quality of the processed parts and reduced processing time. In contrast, centrifugal disk finishing was preferable whenever low erosion and stringent dimensional tolerances were demanded.
机译:使用流化磨料对黄铜(Cu-30 wt。%Zn)环进行的阻力精加工是一种新的精加工技术,通过离心盘精加工进行了比较评估。通过选择两种不同尺寸的相同磨料颗粒并以相同的处理时间或以它们各自的最大速度操作设备来进行比较。实验分析调查了工件形态,精加工过程中材料去除和尺寸精度的变化。结果表明,研究中所研究的每种类型的设备均具有较高的精加工性能,并且加工时间相对较短。但是,流化床辅助阻力精加工在可加工零件的可达到质量和减少加工时间方面都比离心盘精加工更有效。相反,每当要求低腐蚀和严格的尺寸公差时,最好使用离心盘精加工。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号